Legal Opinion
Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Pool
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided November 21, 2000No. 07-99-0429-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN T. BOYD, Chief Justice.
This dispute is between parties to a gas lease in which the lessors claim that the lease has terminated due to a cessation in production. Appellants Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America (NGPL), Mid-Con Gas Services Corp. (MidCon), and Chesapeake Panhandle Limited Partnership (Chesapeake) appeal from a judgment rendered against them in favor of appel-lees 1 that the subject gas lease terminated pursuant to the terms of the habendum clause of the lease and which awarded damages and attorney’s fees.
In 13 points, appellants claim that (1) the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. PoolTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Krabbe v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
- Teon Management, LLC v. TURQUOISE BAY CORP., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2012
- Ridenour v. Herrington, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- PPC Transportation v. Metcalf, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.