Legal Opinion

Peacock v. Schroeder

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided January 20, 1993No. 04-91-00600-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Joe R. Peacock sought a declaratory judgment that an oil and gas lease on a portion of his property had terminated due to non-production in paying quantities. In the event the lease was found to be valid, Peacock sought a declaration that the lease denied the lessee, Walter R. Schroeder, access across Peacock’s land to the leased premises. Finally, Peacock sought a declaration that the lease denied Schroeder the right to locate oil field equipment on Peacock’s property. Schroeder filed a counterclaim seeking declarations that the lease had not terminated, and that he had an implied…

3Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Oake v. Collin CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Davis v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. Abraxas Petroleum Corp. v. Hornburg, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
  2. Spiller v. Spiller, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  3. In the Interest of M.M.O.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Harris County Municipal Utility District No. 156 v. United Somerset Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  5. Forest Oil Corp. v. El Rucio Land & Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API