Legal Opinion
United States v. Morris
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 26, 1979No. Nos. 78-1027 to 78-1030PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants Morris, Jelsma, Keef, and Jarvis have taken these timely appeals from convictions for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955, conducting, financing, managing, supervising, directing or owning all or part of an illegal gambling business involving bookmaking and wagering on sporting events, involving five persons or more.1 Appellants not only challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support their convictions, but they also contend the trial judge erred when he refused to repoll the jury after the jury foreman changed his verdict when polled as to a fifth…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. Cooley Ronald L. Taylor Gary P. Leber Merri W. Turner, Also Known as Merrie Foutz and Charles W. MatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Sakhawat Ullah, Jr., United States of America v. Mary Katherine Gosho-KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Sammy G. Daily and Frederik A. FiggeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. James Douglas, Martin L. Pruitt, Leon MasonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Elijah Albert Boone, Dehlia E. Boone, Jerry Boone and Roger SwayzeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.