Legal Opinion
Wynn v. Wynn
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1947PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColden, J.
Motion by the plaintiff to, dismiss, pursuant to rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, the three complete defenses which the defendant has asserted to plaintiff’s first cause of action.
The cause of action to which the defenses here challenged are addressed alleges that the parties were married in the borough of Brooklyn on May 22, 1941, and that there is no issue of the marriage; that on the 1st day of September, 1943, the plaintiff procured an alleged judgment of divorce in the First Civil Court for the Bravos District for the State of Chihuahua, Mexico, in which action the defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Querze v. QuerzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Vose v. VoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Stevens v. StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Feldman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Krieger v. KriegerNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Sorrentino v. MierzwaNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Tantleff v. TantleffNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Department of Social Services ex rel. Thompson v. DinkinsNew York Family Court · 1981
- In re the Estate of CarterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.