Krieger v. Krieger
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
The function of the declaratory judgment has commonly been understood by the profession to be to determine justiciable controversies between parties which either are not yet ripe for adjudication by conventional forms of remedy, or which, for other reasons, are not conveniently amenable to the usual remedies. Underlying the policy which sanctions the use of the action is the concept that it will serve some useful purpose to the parties, e.g., to settle controversy and discourage potential litigation.
Judge Crane, writing for the court in James v. Alderton Dock Yards (256 N. Y. 298) which has…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Brownell v. Board of Education of Inside Tax District of City of Saratoga SpringsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Lowe v. LoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Somberg v. SombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Zuckerman v. The Metropolitan Museum of ArtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. RollinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Ricca v. ValentiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- John J. S. v. Theresa L.New York Family Court · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.