Legal Opinion

Lopatkovich v. City of Tiffin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1986No. 86-204PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff-appellant contends that she has established a prima facie case of negligence, and that in light of the comparative negligence statute (R.C. 2315.19), it was improper for the trial court to grant summary judgments in defendants’ favor. Plaintiff further argues that Tiffin Ordinance No. 521.061 compels owners and occupiers of property abutting public sidewalks to remove ice and snow from such sidewalks, and that when the violation of such ordinance by an occupier or owner results in injury to a pedestrian, a prima facie cause in negligence arises. Plaintiff also submits that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sidle v. HumphreyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Debie v. Cochran Pharmacy-Berwick, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Rich v. RosenshineWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Brinkman v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Wallace v. Ohio Department of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Goode v. Mt. Gillion Baptist Church, Unpublished Decision (12-28-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Brinkman v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1993

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API