Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Ohio Department of Commerce

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 2002No. 2000-2178PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

{¶ 1} This case asks us to decide whether the state may raise the public-duty rule as a bar to liability in an action in the Court of Claims alleging negligent inspection by the Ohio Department of Commerce, Division of the Fire Marshal (“fire marshal”). Because the public-duty rule is inconsistent with the express language of the Court of Claims Act, we hold that the state may not.

I

{¶ 2} On July 3, 1996, Todd Hall carried a lit cigarette into the Ohio River Fireworks store in Scottown, Lawrence County, Ohio. Before store employees could intervene, Hall used the cigarette to ignite a stack of…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
  3. Ficek v. MorkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Natrona County v. BlakeWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. McNerney v. Rescap Borrower Claims Trust (In re Residential Capital, LLC)District Court, S.D. New York · 2016

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API