Legal Opinion
Hauge v. Vanderhave
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 23, 1993No. 91P-1138; CA A73579PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*223ROSSMAN, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment for defendant. Having reviewed the record in the light most favorable to plaintiff to determine whether there is any genuine issue of material fact and whether defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation, 284 Or 695, 699, 588 P2d 1100 (1978), we reverse.
In April, 1989, plaintiff, a grass seed farmer, began negotiating to purchase a 130-acre parcel of farmland. The property was subject to defendant’s lease, which was to expire on December 31,1989. Plaintiff did not want to wait that long to take…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Mann v. WetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Bartlam v. TikkaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Oakridge Cablevision, Inc. v. First Interstate BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Milne v. Milne Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Century Indemnity Co. v. Marine Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Edwards v. Merle West Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Hamilton Properties, Inc. v. Associated Grocers Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Wihtol v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.