Wihtol v. Lynn
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment in a declaratory judgment action to enforce a contract. Plaintiff seeks a declaration that the enhanced-fee clause in the contract under which plaintiff represented defendants in a medical malpractice action is enforceable. The trial court granted summary judgment to defendants and entered a declaration that the enhanced fee clause is unenforceable. We conclude that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants and in denying summary judgment to plaintiff. We therefore reverse and remand with instructions to enter summary judgment for plaintiff.
W…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- United States National Bank v. BogeOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Mann v. WetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Martin v. City of TigardOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- Hauge v. VanderhaveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bong v. Douglas Ed. Service Dist.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025