Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Messinger

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 26, 1947No. 15,879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Luxford

This is a workmen’s compensation case. For convenience, we will refer to the parties as follows: Industrial Commission of Colorado, as the Commission, Danny’s Inc., as the employer, State Compensation Fund, as the Fund and defendant in error, Mary Cecelia Messinger, as Claimant.

Claimant was a waitress handling food in a local restaurant. She was directed by her employer to secure a health certificate, and submitted herself to a physician who drew from her arm some blood for the purpose of making the blood test required by law. The lesion made by the physician became infected, and as a result…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Seamless Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. Jefferson Printing Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Neudeck v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Smith v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. A. Carbone & Co. v. MacGregorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maher v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Atiles Moreu v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
  3. King v. ArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Williams v. Central Flying Service Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  5. Atiles Moréu v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API