Legal Opinion

Hirasa v. Burtner

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1985No. 9886; CIVIL NO. 72071PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WAKATSUKI, J.

We focus on two issues in this appeal. Whether the trial court erred in dismissing Defendants’ (Appellants), Jesse H. Burtner, Cackle Fresh Egg Farms, Olson Farms, Inc., and Fairview Egg Farms, Inc., third-party complaint against the Third-Party Defendants (Appellees), Paul Burnett, Sylvester Cullen, Edward Souza, Jr. and the City and County of Honolulu, based on the exclusiveness of liability under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 386-5; 1 and whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendants’ motion to amend their third-party complaint.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. John W. Dussouy, Jr. v. Gulf Coast Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Hanagami v. China Airlines, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Kamali v. Hawaiian Electric Co., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Bishop Trust Co. v. Kamokila Development Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Iddings v. Mee-LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Myrtle Beach Pipeline Corp. v. Emerson Electric Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
  3. Shanghai Inv. Co., Inc. v. Alteka Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Marshall v. University of Hawai'iHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API