Legal Opinion
Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 2002No. B155748, B157031, B157038, B157773, B160717PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MUNOZ, J. *
We issued a writ of review in this case to consider the lawfulness of certain rulings by the Public Utilities Commission (Commission), revising a formula adopted pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 390, subdivision (b), which is used to determine the amount petitioner Southern California Edison (Edison) is required to pay certain providers of small amounts of electricity. We affirm the decisions of the Commission except as modified.
Procedural Background
On March 27, 2001, in Decision No. 01-03-067 1 (Decision) the Commission instituted a new formula by which to measure…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dominguez v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Utility Consumers' Action Network v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Armenta Ex Rel. City of Burbank v. Mueller Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Armenta Ex Rel. City of Burbank v. Mueller Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.