Foster v. Bittersweet Experience, Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
Following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs Robert and Roberta Foster, defendant Bittersweet Experience, Inc. appeals the verdict and the Rutland Superior Court’s denial of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, for a new trial. Defendant raises four arguments on appeal: (1) the trial court erred in its charge to the jury regarding the mitigation of damages, whether plaintiff Robert Foster was discharged, and whether such discharge was a result of his refusal to take a polygraph examination or some other intervening cause; (2) the special verdict forms…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bacon v. LascellesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Murray v. St. Michael's CollegeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Agency of Natural Resources v. Glens Falls InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Ulm v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Follo v. FlorindoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Zachariah Blondin v. Milton Town School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021