Ulm v. Ford Motor Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtAmestoy, C.J.
Defendant Ford Motor Company appeals from a Windham Superior Court jury verdict awarding plaintiff James Ulm $1.25 million for injuries he sustained as a passenger in a Ford Bronco where the claimed cause of injury was a defective steering system. On appeal, defendant argues that (1) the court erred in denying defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law because plaintiff failed to establish that the alleged defect caused plaintiff’s injuries; (2) the court erred in excluding evidence that plaintiff was not wearing a safety belt when the accident occurred; (3) the court abused its…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lent v. HuntoonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Myott v. MyottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Ball v. Melsur Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Bacon v. LascellesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. And Franchise World Headquarters, Inc. v. John M. WeibleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. JoergSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Estep v. Mike Ferrell Ford Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Sweet v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Bishop v. Takata Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Connelly v. Hyundai Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.