Legal Opinion

Ulm v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 7, 2000No. 97-308PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAmestoy, C.J.

Defendant Ford Motor Company appeals from a Windham Superior Court jury verdict awarding plaintiff James Ulm $1.25 million for injuries he sustained as a passenger in a Ford Bronco where the claimed cause of injury was a defective steering system. On appeal, defendant argues that (1) the court erred in denying defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law because plaintiff failed to establish that the alleged defect caused plaintiff’s injuries; (2) the court erred in excluding evidence that plaintiff was not wearing a safety belt when the accident occurred; (3) the court abused its…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lent v. HuntoonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  2. Myott v. MyottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. Ball v. Melsur Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. Bacon v. LascellesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  5. Doctor's Associates, Inc. And Franchise World Headquarters, Inc. v. John M. WeibleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. JoergSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. Estep v. Mike Ferrell Ford Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Sweet v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. Bishop v. Takata Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  5. Connelly v. Hyundai Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API