Legal Opinion
Agency of Natural Resources v. Glens Falls Insurance
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 25, 1999No. 98-073PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
This case concerns a dispute among the parties and their insurers over the allocation of costs for the cleanup of a series of gasoline leaks. The superior court ruled that Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty) was responsible for approximately 92% of the costs, that the Continental/Glens Falls Insurance Company (Continental) was responsible for the balance, and that Liberty’s counterclaim against the State of Vermont for contribution was without merit. Liberty appeals, contending the court erred in: (1) dismissing its counterclaim against the State; (2) making certain findings concerning…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Estate of Fleming v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Johnson v. Pearson Agri-Systems, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Norfolk & Dedham Fire Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Robtoy v. City of St. AlbansSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- State v. FisherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- EBWS, LLC v. Britly Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Housing Authority Risk Retention Group, Inc. v. Chicago Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- In Re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.