Legal Opinion
Capital Freight Lines v. City of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 1962No. Civ. 10388PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in an action in which it sought to cancel an assessment levied on real property it owns.
In March of 1958, the City of Sacramento, acting under the provisions of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Sts. & Hy. Code, § 5000 et seq.) adopted a resolution of intention to improve certain streets. The area to be improved was posted with notices of adoption of the resolution of intention (Sts. & Hy. Code, §5190). Notice of the passage of the resolution was published in accordance with the statutory requirements (Sts. & Hy. Code, §§ 5061 and 5062). However, no…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Wilcox v. EngebretsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Voigt v. Detroit CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- County of Riverside v. WhitlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Jeffery v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Hoffman v. City of Red BluffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- George A. Fuller Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965