Legal Opinion
Reliance Insurance v. Moessner
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 5, 1997No. 95-1899PublishedCited by 212 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal in an insurance coverage dispute founded on diversity jurisdiction requires us to determine whether a total pollution exclusion endorsement (TPE) became part of a comprehensive general liability (CGL) renewal policy issued by Reliance Insurance Company (Reliance) to Vapor Energy Service and Engineering Corporation (VE). The effect of the TPE would be to immunize Reliance from defending and paying the products liability tort claim brought against VE in federal court by Mark Moessner, who sustained carbon monoxide poisoning as the result of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Burt N. Sempier v. Johnson & HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Collister v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Erie Insurance Exchange v. Transamerica InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by212 opinions
- Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Pignataro v. Port Auth. of New York and New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- The Medical Protective Company v. William WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- J.C. Penney Life Insurance Company v. Christian J. Pilosi James C. PilosiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Belt Painting Corp. v. TIG InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.