Legal Opinion

Miller v. Boston Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1966No. Appeal, 225PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

Appellee, Benjamin Miller, brought an action' of assumpsit against appellant, Boston Insurance Company, to recover for the loss of a diamond ring, which was insured by appellant under a Jewelers’ -Block Policy. The policy insured appellee against “all risks of loss of of damage . . . arising from any cause whatsoever except: ... (M) Unexplained loss, mysterious disappearance or loss or shortage disclosed on taking inventory”.

On March 11, 1958,.Miller, a dealer in jewelry, consigned -the ring to Jacob Friedman, who-was also a jewelry dealer."- On the following…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Blue Anchor Overall Co. v. Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Sun Insurance Office, Limited v. ClaySupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  5. Connolly v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Erie Insurance Exchange v. Transamerica InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Peters Township School District v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. Butterfield v. GiuntoliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. McEwing v. Lititz Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API