Reynolds v. Kinsey
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. In processioning proceedings, ten-days written notice of the time of running and marking the disputed boundary lines shall be given to all owners of adjoining lands, if resident within the State, and the processioners shall not proceed to run and mark such lines until they receive satisfactory evidence of the service of such notice. Civil Code (1910), § 3818. The time fixed by the written notice may, however, be postponed, and merely verbal notice of the new date fixed may be given to the interested landowners. Garrett v. Massee & Felton Lumber Co., 134 Ga. 442 (67 S. E. 1036). Even though…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Amos v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- McCollum v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Bowen v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Georgia Talc Co. v. Cohutta Talc Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Boyce v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hall v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Hayes v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Overstreet v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Page v. GuinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Hackle v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.