Legal Opinion

Chism v. Wilkerson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 22, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Processioning. Before Judge Mitchell. Berrien superior court.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, C. J.

Under the ruling in Ratteree v. Morrow, 71 Ga. 528, where

a protest is filed to the return of proeessioners by the party notified, and on the trial evidence is introduced on both sides, the applicant for the proceedings is entitled to open and conclude the argument,- and this is true although he may introduce in evidence the entire proceedings duly returned, and thus make out a prima facie case.

Judgment affirmed.

AH the Justices concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rattaree v. MorrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Castleberry v. ParrishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Georgia Talc Co. v. Cohutta Talc Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Crowley v. VarnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954