Legal Opinion

Burns v. Thomas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1990No. C-7969PublishedCited by 226 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPEARS, Justice.

This is a legal malpractice action. When Carl Burns was sued by the Arkansas Casket Company, he hired Richard Wardroup to represent him as his attorney. Although Bums received a favorable jury verdict, the trial court rendered judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of the Arkansas Casket Company. The judgment was not appealed. Burns then sued Wardroup, alleging that Wardroup was negligent in failing to oppose Arkansas Casket’s j.n.o.v. motion and in failing to appeal. Bums later amended his pleadings to add Wardroup’s former law partner, Larriet Thomas, as a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Woods v. William M. Mercer, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Sanchez v. SchindlerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Weaver v. WittTexas Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by226 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. HOLY CROSS CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST v. WolfTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Valero Energy Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Farah v. Mafrige & Kormanik, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996

221 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API