Legal Opinion
Dauphine v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 5, 1943No. Civ. 14006PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The question presented by this original proceeding for review is whether decedent’s surviving widow is barred from recovering compensation for the loss of her husband by virtue of the “going and coming” rule or did he receive his fatal injuries in an automobile collision while engaged on a special mission for his employer. In approaching a solution we are not unmindful of the wholesome guiding rules by which the reviewing court is not to determine the weight to be given the evidence (Dearborn v. Industrial Acc. Com., 187 Cal. 591 [203 P. 112]), or which of two opposing inferences should be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Barragar v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Western Pac. R. R. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Matter of Grieb v. . HammerleNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Smith v. University of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
- Frederick v. Younger Van LinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Schreifer v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Wilson v. Rowan Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.