Legal Opinion

Truck Insurance Exchange v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1946No. L. A. No. 19492PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

— Petitioner, the insurance carrier for Elmore W. Peterson, seeks review and annulment of a death benefit award in favor of the dependent widow and minor children of James D. Dollarhide, employee of Peterson. Dollar-hide was killed when a truck collided with his automobile as he drove along the public highway from a ranch of Peterson, where Dollarhide worked, toward another ranch owned by Peterson, where the Dollar hides lived. Petitioner contends that the fatal injury was not sustained in the course of and did not arise out of the employment. We have concluded that the award must be affirmed.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Freire v. Matson Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Makins v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Reinert v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Lundberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Madin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API