United States ex rel. Simmons v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL W. GRIMM,' District Judge.
Relator Robert Simmons (“Relator” or “Simmons”) moves for an award of 22% of 'the $2.3,million settlement.between the United States and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”), pursuant to ' the qui tam: relator’s share provisions of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d)(1). Relator’s Mot., ECF No. 38. Simmons contends that his contribution to the Government’s settlement with . Samsung entitles him to 22% of the settlement proceeds. Relator’s Mem. 1, ECF No. 38-1. The Government opposes Simmons’s motion and flies a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. NEC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States Ex Rel. Burr v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
- United States Ex Rel. Alderson v. Quorum Health Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
- United States Ex Rel. Pedicone v. Mazak Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- United States ex rel. Shea v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burke v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021