Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Simmons v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 1, 2015No. Case No. PWG-11-cv-2971PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL W. GRIMM,' District Judge.

Relator Robert Simmons (“Relator” or “Simmons”) moves for an award of 22% of 'the $2.3,million settlement.between the United States and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”), pursuant to ' the qui tam: relator’s share provisions of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d)(1). Relator’s Mot., ECF No. 38. Simmons contends that his contribution to the Government’s settlement with . Samsung entitles him to 22% of the settlement proceeds. Relator’s Mem. 1, ECF No. 38-1. The Government opposes Simmons’s motion and flies a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. NEC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. United States Ex Rel. Burr v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
  3. United States Ex Rel. Alderson v. Quorum Health Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
  4. United States Ex Rel. Pedicone v. Mazak Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
  5. United States ex rel. Shea v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burke v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API