Legal Opinion

United States v. NEC Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 15, 1993No. 92-2854PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

The United States of America, as appellee in the present case, moves to dismiss the appellant’s qui tam action brought under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. Because we find that a qui tam action survives the death of the plaintiff-relator, we DENY the appellee’s motion to dismiss and GRANT the appellant’s motion for substitution of a personal representative. This is an issue of first impression in the federal appellate courts.

I. BACKGROUND-

The appellant, Arthur Williams, brought a qui tam action under 31 U.S.C. § 3730 against the appellee, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Schreiber v. SharplessSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Denis J. Murphy, Trustee v. Household Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  5. In the Matter Of: Betty Lou Wood, Bankrupt. First National Bank & Trust Company in MacOn v. William M. Flatau, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Jeffrey Parchman v. SLM Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Liana Revock v. Cowpet Bay West Condominium AsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. Hooters of Augusta, Inc. v. American Global InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2003
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Timeless Investments, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
  5. Figueroa Ex Rel. Estate of Figueroa v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API