Legal Opinion

State v. Jolley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 1996No. 930910M; CA A89104PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160, and harassment, ORS 166,065, assigning error to the court’s treatment of the underlying charges as misdemeanors rather than violations. We affirm.

The issue in this case is the same as that addressed in State v. Bonnin, 144 Or App 263, 926 P2d 830 (1996): whether the state satisfied the requirements of ORS 161.565(2) in order to proceed with certain offenses as misdemeanors. Defendant asserts that it did not, and that the trial court consequently erred by allowing both offenses to be prosecuted as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LovetteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. BonninCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SennCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. State v. PeoplesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API