Legal Opinion

State v. Lake

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1982No. 82PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant argues four assignments of error in his brief. Our review of the factual circumstances of this record and the law applicable thereto does not, however, disclose prejudicial error requiring a new trial. We therefore affirm defendant’s conviction for first degree murder.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for severance from a joint murder trial with Abrams. We disagree.

To begin with, we hold that the cases of defendant and Abrams were properly joined for trial pursuant to G.S. 15A-926(b)(2) since both were charged with…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. PinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. MooseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API