State v. Klingenberger

Throughout this opinion, the defendant in error will be called the defendant.

It is contended by the state that the reversal of judgment by the Court of Appeals was erroneous, first, because the defendant had waived his right to object to the proceedings by not filing a plea in abatement; second, because the jurisdiction of the juvenile court is not exclusive over minors charged with felony. We agree with the state in both of these contentions.

In the trial court, the defendant attacked the record on the ground of an alleged defect therein existing. This defect had to be shown by a fact…