Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Petty

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 2013No. A130605PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1412Opinion

RICHMAN, J,

After pleading guilty to felony grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (a)),1 Nicholas Daniel Petty challenges on appeal two of the conditions of his probation, namely that he take antipsychotic medications at the direction of his mental health worker and that he stay at least 50 yards from the victim’s home. He also challenges the legality of a stay-away order prohibiting him from coming within 100 yards of the victim or her daughter.

Resolution of the first question requires us to consider the applicability of our prior decision in In re Luis F. (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 176 [99…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. Ricardo P. (In Re Ricardo P.)California Supreme Court · 2019
  2. People v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. HartleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Cal. Advocates for Nursing Home Reform v. Smith, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API