Legal Opinion

Dow v. L & R Properties, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 11, 2002No. 2311PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Appellants Antoinette Dow, a minor, and her mother, Annette McRae, resided in a rental property managed by appellee L & R Properties, Inc. (“L & R”). Appellants sued L & R *69after Dow allegedly suffered injuries from ingesting lead-based paint inside the home.1 The Circuit Court for Baltimore City granted summary judgment in L & R’s favor on the ground that there was no evidence that any paint on the property contained lead.

ISSUE

In this appeal, appellants seek to revive their case against L & R.2 They argue, in essence:

The trial court erred in granting L & R’s motion for summary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Berkey v. DeliaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Peterson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. Richwind Joint Venture 4 v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Bartholomee v. CaseyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Brown v. DermerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Kirson Alston v. 2700 VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Blackburn Ltd. Partnership v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Rowhouses, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  4. Ross v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Roy v. DackmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API