Dow v. L & R Properties, Inc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Appellants Antoinette Dow, a minor, and her mother, Annette McRae, resided in a rental property managed by appellee L & R Properties, Inc. (“L & R”). Appellants sued L & R *69after Dow allegedly suffered injuries from ingesting lead-based paint inside the home.1 The Circuit Court for Baltimore City granted summary judgment in L & R’s favor on the ground that there was no evidence that any paint on the property contained lead.
ISSUE
In this appeal, appellants seek to revive their case against L & R.2 They argue, in essence:
The trial court erred in granting L & R’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berkey v. DeliaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Peterson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Richwind Joint Venture 4 v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Bartholomee v. CaseyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Brown v. DermerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hamilton v. Kirson Alston v. 2700 VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Blackburn Ltd. Partnership v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Rowhouses, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Ross v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Roy v. DackmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.