Rowhouses, Inc. v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.
In this case, we are asked yet again to address causation in a lead-based paint case where a plaintiffs case rests on circumstantial — as opposed to direct — evidence, and, in this context, we are called upon to attempt to define what consti tutes a reasonable probable source of lead exposure. Specifically, here, we decide whether, in the absence of direct evidence that a property contained lead-based paint, there was sufficient admissible circumstantial evidence produced by a plaintiff, who alleged that she was injured as a child by lead-based paint at a property that the defendant owned and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. SturmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Peterson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Hamilton v. Kirson Alston v. 2700 VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Ross v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Steamfitters Local v. Erie InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Marrick Homes LLC v. RutkowskiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Wallace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Davis v. Regency Lane LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Rogers v. Home Equity USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.