Legal Opinion

Rowhouses, Inc. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 25, 2016No. 60/15PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

In this case, we are asked yet again to address causation in a lead-based paint case where a plaintiffs case rests on circumstantial — as opposed to direct — evidence, and, in this context, we are called upon to attempt to define what consti tutes a reasonable probable source of lead exposure. Specifically, here, we decide whether, in the absence of direct evidence that a property contained lead-based paint, there was sufficient admissible circumstantial evidence produced by a plaintiff, who alleged that she was injured as a child by lead-based paint at a property that the defendant owned and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. SturmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Peterson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Hamilton v. Kirson Alston v. 2700 VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Ross v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Steamfitters Local v. Erie InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Marrick Homes LLC v. RutkowskiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Wallace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Davis v. Regency Lane LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Rogers v. Home Equity USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API