Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Kirson Alston v. 2700 Virginia

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 20, 2014No. 78/13PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

We consolidate these two cases, Hamilton v. Kirson, No. 78, September Term, 2013, and Alston v. 2700 Virginia Avenue Associates, No. 100, September Term, 2013, for purposes of this opinion. In each case, a plaintiff or plaintiffs brought, among other claims, 1 a negligence action against landlords to recover for his or her injuries resulting from lead paint poisoning. 2 Neither plaintiff adduced direct evidence that the respective demised premise was a substantial contributor to the injuries or that the interiors of the homes contained lead paint, but rather relied on circumstantial evidence…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Rosenblatt v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Clea v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Steamfitters Local v. Erie InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Rowhouses, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  3. Roy v. DackmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Eastern Shore Title Co. v. OchseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Zilichikhis v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API