Legal Opinion
JOSE RODRIGUEZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 2015No. 13-CV-1027PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) officers Jose Rodriguez, Andrew Zabavsky, and Benjamin Fetting sued the District of Columbia and other defendants 1 for alleged violations of the Whis-tleblower Protection Act (the “WPA”). 2 The trial court rejected those claims, granting summary judgment to the defendants. The officers now appeal from that order and also assert that the court abused its discretion by denying their motion for leave to amend their complaint. Because no reasonable juror could have found that appellants made protected disclosures, or that prosecutors…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wilburn v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Zirkle v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Dobyns v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE AND RAND SIMBERG v. MICHAEL E. MANN, NATIONAL REVIEW, INC. v. MICHAEL E. MANNDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Harris v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- JACQUELINE FREY v. UNITED STATES.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Competitive Enterprise Institute and Rand Simberg v. Michael MannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Johnson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.