Legal Opinion
JACQUELINE FREY v. UNITED STATES.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 2016No. 15-CM-353PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLEESE, Associate judge:. After a bench-trial, appellant Jacqueline Frey was convicted of unlawful entry, in violation of D.C.Code § 22-3302 (2015 Supp.). Ms. Frey. argues that she was entitled to a jury trial. We agree, and we therefore vacate Ms. Frey’s conviction and remand for further proceedings.
I
In pertinent part, the evidence at trial was as follows. At about 6:30 a.m. on June 24, 2014, Ms. Frey was found asleep at an employee’s desk in a restricted area of the Library of Congress’s Adams Building. The Adams Building is generally open to the public from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. To get…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pittston Coal Group v. SebbenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Whitfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Margaret Williams v. James C, KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Broome v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- Darius Briscoe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Darius Briscoe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Facebook Inc. v. Daron WintDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.