Legal Opinion
Marquam Investment Corp. v. Beers
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 11, 1980No. A 7709 12615, CA 15690PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.
Plaintiff, Marquam Investment Corporation, which owns residential property which has been subject to past, and allegedly will be subject to future application of the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, 1 ORS 91.700-91.895, brought this declaratory judgment action challenging the constitutionality of various provisions of the act. The trial court rejected Marquam’s challenges and held that the act was constitutional. Marquam appeals. We affirm.
Marquam aims a disparate, scattered attack at the constitutionality of the act. 2 Marquam contests the validity of most major provisions of the act,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nash v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Spray v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Imperial Colliery Co. v. FoutWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Marquam Investment Corp. v. BeersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.