State Forester v. Umpqua River Navigation Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
The plaintiffs are the State Forester and a governmental subdivision created for fire fighting purposes. Plaintiffs brought this statutory proceeding to recover the fire suppression costs incurred in fighting a large forest fire known as the Oxbow fire. Plaintiffs allege that the fire was started by the negligence of the defendant. A jury returned a verdict for defendant and plaintiffs appeal.
On August 20 the defendant, Umpqua River Navigation Company, was working on a federal contract to resurface a forest road. Umpqua spread gravel and then compacted it by running a roller over it. On that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. ValentineOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Salsberry v. Archibald Plbg. & Heat. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of NesbittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- City of Boston v. DitsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.