Legal Opinion

State Forester v. Umpqua River Navigation Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1970PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiffs are the State Forester and a governmental subdivision created for fire fighting purposes. Plaintiffs brought this statutory proceeding to recover the fire suppression costs incurred in fighting a large forest fire known as the Oxbow fire. Plaintiffs allege that the fire was started by the negligence of the defendant. A jury returned a verdict for defendant and plaintiffs appeal.

On August 20 the defendant, Umpqua River Navigation Company, was working on a federal contract to resurface a forest road. Umpqua spread gravel and then compacted it by running a roller over it. On that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. ValentineOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Salsberry v. Archibald Plbg. & Heat. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Matter of NesbittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. City of Boston v. DitsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API