Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Rogers
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 20, 1992No. CC 79,651-A; CA A64589; SC S38258PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
We allowed review in this case to consider whether the exclusionary rule applies in a probation revocation proceeding. The Court of Appeals held that it does not. State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Rogers, 107 Or App 370, 812 P2d 14 (1991). We disagree. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the circuit court for further proceedings.
Petitioner is a juvenile who had been placed on probation by the juvenile court for conduct that would have been crimes if committed by an adult. ORS 419.476(l)(a). The state filed a petition alleging that petitioner had violated his probation by unlawfully possessing a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. LopezHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. Arter, K., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Billings v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.