Legal Opinion
Dubose v. Hills
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 15, 1975No. Civ. H-75-303, H-75-345, H-75-346PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this action are low-income residents of a federally subsidized housing project, Windham Heights Apartments, in Windham, Connecticut. They complain that the federal 1 and private 2 defendants have denied them, and others similarly situated, rights protected by the fifth amendment, as well as rights created by the National Housing Act 3 as it was amended by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, 4 and regulations issued pursuant to that Act. 5 They seek declaratory and injunctive…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Checker Motors Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Motors Corporation, Checker Taxi Company, Inc., Additional on CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Rubylee Davis, in No. 73-1249. v. George W. Romney, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in No. 73-1420Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- MINOR v. the Mechanics Bank of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hilda Abrams v. Carla A. Hills, as Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Dubose v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Underwood v. HillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
- Dubose v. PierceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Battles Farm Co. v. HillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.