Legal Opinion
Hilda Abrams v. Carla A. Hills, as Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 1, 1976No. 76-2095PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELY, Circuit Judge:
This suit was instituted by residents of a multi-family housing project, Meyler Park, constructed with assistance provided under the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1715z-l (1970) (Supp. IV). The provision of that Act at issue in the present appeal established the “operating subsidy” program, a program that we shall explain. The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter the Secretary) refused to implement the “operating subsidy” program on various grounds, and in September, 1975, the plaintiffs, here the appellees, sued, 1 alleging that the failure of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Russell v. LandrieuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Rank v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Graff v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Selden Apartments v. United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.