Legal Opinion

Dubose v. Pierce

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 14, 1985No. Nos. 581, 582, 583, Dockets 84-6145, 84-6169, 84-6171, 85-6017PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESKILL, Circuit Judge:

This action is before us on appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Blumenfeld, J, granting plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (1982) (EAJA). The court held that the government’s position in litigation was not substantially justified so that a fee award to plaintiffs was proper. Because we disagree with the court’s conclusion, we reverse. We also dismiss plaintiffs’ cross-appeal concerning the amount and calculation of the award.

I

This case…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Stanley Spencer v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Dougherty, Gregory v. Lehman, John, Secretary of the Navy, Dougherty, Gregory v. Lehman, John, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  3. O'BRIEN v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Brigadier General Roland F. Cinciarelli v. The Honorable Ronald Reagan, President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Tyler Business Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. In Re Revel AC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Franklin M. YoffeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  4. Mohammed v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Mohammed v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API