Legal Opinion

Franklin E. Penny Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 22, 1975No. 433-73PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PeR Curiam : This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion, filed June 12, 1975, pursuant to Rule 141(b) [but deemed to have been filed under Rule 54(b) (iii)], requesting that the court adopt the recommended decision of Trial Judge John P. Wiese*, filed April 28, 1975, pursuant to Rule 166(c) on plaintiff’s motion and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, since plaintiff has failed to file a timely request for review by the court of the trial judge’s recommended decision. Upon consideration thereof, without oral argument, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  2. Scott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. Paccon, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. Ala Moana Boat Owners' Ass'n v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  5. LeRoy Dyal Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Western Securities Company, a Subsidiary of Universal Mortgage Corporation v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Kinetic Builder's, Inc.,appellant v. F. Whitten Peters, Secretary of the Air Force,appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  4. Hardwick Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  5. Blinderman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API