Southern Auto Finance Co. Ex Rel. Clark v. Pittman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
The court gave peremptory instructions with respect to issues 2, 3, 4, and 5. Defendants assign these instructions as error.
Defendants, having admitted the execution of the note and lien, had the burden of establishing their plea of payment. Schwabenton v. Bank, 251 N.C. 655, 111 S.E. 2d 856; Paving Co. v. Speedways, Inc., 250 N.C. 358, 108 S.E. 2d 641.
To show payment defendants rely on a check for $3,000, dated 30 September 1959, drawn by Tommy Pittman on First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co., payable to plaintiff's order. This statement appears on the check:
“This check is in payment of items as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carolina Discount Corp. v. Landis Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Wilson v. Commercial Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- M. & J. Finance Corp. v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Whitehurst v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Paris v. Carolina Builders CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McIntyre v. ClarksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Community Credit Co. of Lenoir, Inc. v. NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- International Serv. Ins. Co. v. Iowa Nat. Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Luther v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.