Legal Opinion

Petit v. Minnesota

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 9, 1900No. 194PublishedCited by 88 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPBEME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

Petit was tried and convicted of keeping open a barber shop on Sunday for the purpose of cutting, hair and shaving beards,' contrary to section 6513 of the General Statutes of Minnesota for 1894, and the judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Minnesota. 74 Minn. 376. This writ of error was then allowed.

Section 6513 reads as follows: “ All labor on Suriday is prohibited, excepting the works of necessity or charity. In works of necessity or charity is included whatever is needful during the day for good order, health or comfort of the community: Provided, however, That keeping open a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Hennington v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Ex parte NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Ex parte AndrewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. State v. PetitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. New York Ex Rel. Bryant v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Radice v. People of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API