Ulman v. Mayor of Baltimore
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The decree from which this appeal was taken was passed by Judge Dennis. The case is stated in the opinion of this Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, J.
The identical question arising on the record now before us has been passed on by this Court on several occasions, but is now presented distinctively as a Feel-' eral question. When the validity of ordinance No. 98 *589of 1816, passed by the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, under the Act of 1874, ch. 218, was assailed in Mayor and City Council of Baltimore vs. Scharf, et al., 54 Md., 499, a majority of the Judges who heard that case declared the ordinance void because, among other reasons, it failed to provide for notice to, and a hearing of, the owners of the property binding on the street…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. Nationwide Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Pickett v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- County Commissioners v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Baltimore Belt Railroad v. BaltzellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
- Levering v. Park CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.