Legal Opinion

Mayor of Baltimore v. Sitnick

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 27, 1969No. [No. 295, September Term, 1968.] [No. 297, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.

These two appeals 1 were consolidated by the lower court and present the question of the validity of Ordinance Nos. 370, 491, 739 and 1219, now comprising Article 19, Sections 51 through 61 of the Baltimore City Code (1966 Ed.), as amended, enacted by the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore to establish minimum wage standards for certain private employments within the City’s jurisdiction.

In both cases the defendants are the City, the members of the City Minimum Wage Commission and the Commission’s Executive Director. In No. 295, the plaintiffs are Milton Sitnick, t/a Hilton House, a tavern…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lutz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  5. Wholesale Laundry Board of Trade, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Police Commissioner v. DowlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. City of Miami Beach v. Rocio Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Mayor of Annapolis v. Annapolis Waterfront Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Rinzler v. CarsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  5. County Council v. Investors Funding Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API