Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1983No. 831SC291PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant assigns error to the denial of her motions to dismiss the charges, arguing “there was insufficient evidence to sustain a conviction on these charges.” More specifically, defendant contends that the uncontradicted evidence demonstrated that she acted in self-defense, and that she did not use excessive force.

“[V]oluntary manslaughter occurs when one kills intentionally but does so in the heat of passion suddenly aroused by adequate provocation or in the exercise of self-defense where excessive force under the circumstances is employed or where the defendant is the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Earl Richmond, Jr. v. Marvin L. Polk, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  2. State v. RathboneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. ArnetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Richmond v. PolkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  5. State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API