Hayes v. Coombe
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioner appeals the district court’s decision to dismiss his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
The district court held that one of petitioner’s claims was procedurally forfeited (because petitioner failed to make a contemporaneous objection at trial) and that the procedural default was adopted by the state appellate court as an independent and adequate ground for affirming the conviction.
Whether the claim was procedurally forfeited turns upon an analysis of the state court’s opinion rejecting the claim. While an independent and adequate state ground for rejecting a federal claim (e.g.,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- William Daye v. Attorney General of the State of New York and Eugene Le Fevre, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Joseph Fama v. Commissioner of Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- McLean v. McGinnisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Young v. ConwayDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Hayes v. CoombeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Rice v. KuhlmannDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002