Legal Opinion

Young v. Conway

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 27, 2011No. 6:07-cr-06047PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR E. BIANCHINI, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction

Pro se petitioner Rudolph Young (“Young” or “Petitioner”) seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the constitutionality of his conviction, following a jury trial, on two counts of first degree robbery and one count of first degree burglary.

The parties have consented to disposition of this matter by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).

II. Factual Background and Procedural History

A. The First Trial

The incident giving rise to Young’s convictions was the…

2Cases cited96 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Young v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. Hill v. AnnucciDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024
  3. Jackson v. EckertDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
  4. People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API