Legal Opinion
Schessler v. Keck
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1956No. Civ. 21276PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Plaintiff Elizabeth Schessler appeals from a summary judgment rendered pursuant to section 437c. Code of Civil Procedure, in favor of defendants William Keck and Jean Keck. In an amended complaint plaintiff charges defendants William Keck, Jean Keek, Sallie May Ferguson, and Hazel Edwards, with slander in that they made statements imputing to her a loathsome disease. The utterances are alleged to have occurred in August, 1948, and to have been repeated by defendant Edwards to one Ann Storms in the winter of 1949 or spring of 1950, and to one Nell Robinson in March, 1952. It is further alleged…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Mox Incorporated v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Moropoulos v. C. H. & O. B. Fuller Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bowden v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Snider v. SniderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Southern Pacific Co. v. FishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Barnes v. Blue Haven PoolsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Hayward Union High School District v. MadridCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.