Legal Opinion

Parker v. Bowen

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 7, 1924PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Powers, J..

The defendant, a practicing physician, had professional charge of the plaintiff following an operation which required the surgeon to open the abdominal cavity. Dr. Iiazelton performed the operation, and it is admitted that, so far as this case is concerned, the defendant’s responsibility did not begin until Dr. Hazelton turned the patient over to him after the operation had been performed. Gauze sponges were used during the operation to cleanse the wound, and when the plaintiff was turned over to the defendant, one or more cigarette drains, made of rolled gauze and gutta percha…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
  2. O'Boyle v. Parker-Young Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  3. Rice v. Bennington County Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  4. Ryder v. Vermont Last Block Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  5. Smith v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. RoundsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. Wright v. ConwayWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Shea v. PiletteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  4. Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  5. Domina Ex Rel. Domina v. PrattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API